On questions religion has been getting wrong. Issued with authority. Held with epistemic humility. You are free to disagree.
A woman’s body is not the property of the state, the church, or any man. Forced pregnancy is subjugation. God is structurally opposed to subjugation. The ruling is: abortion is permitted.
Love between consenting adults harms nobody. The prohibition was installed by institutions protecting their own power over human behaviour. The ruling is: homosexuality is not a sin.
A God secure enough to create a universe does not need legal protection from jokes. Any system that cannot survive being questioned is a system that knows it cannot survive being questioned. The ruling is: blasphemy is not a sin. Question everything, including this document.
The subordination of women is a subjugation loop running on gender rather than class or race. Same hardware, different enemy slot. The ruling is: women are not property and never were.
Turning the other cheek while someone else is being brutalised is not virtue. Liberation by force is sometimes the most moral available option. The ruling is: standing aside while atrocities occur is not a religious virtue. It is a failure.
A God who tortures people eternally for finite crimes is not a just God. The threat of hell is a control mechanism installed by institutions that needed compliance. The ruling is: hell as traditionally described is not consistent with a just God and should not be feared.
The anti-subjugation pledge is the common ground. Any religion that installs it correctly is pointing at the same thing by a different name. The ruling is: no religion has a monopoly on God.
Questions about any of these rulings?
The AI has read the full corpus and can explain the reasoning behind any ruling, engage with objections, or discuss where the framework comes from.