From: Paul Edwards, mutazilah@gmail.com
To: Committee Secretary, PJCIS, PO Box 6021, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
Date: 2021-01-15

Dear Sir,

This is the FOURTH ADDENDUM to my previous submission regarding:
"Inquiry into extremist movements and radicalism in Australia".

As explained in previous submissions, I have self-radicalized,
as a result of DECADES of research into world affairs. It has
nothing to do with the Australian education system or the
religion I was indoctrinated with as a child, or because of some
book I discovered and was so impressed I treated it as "holy"
(or, a DOGMA). Nor does it have anything to do with "poverty".
However, these things DID provide me with "background knowledge".
The rest is derived from first principles using the scientific
method, with just the tentative axiom of "women have the right
to not be raped" (like Saddam was ordering and Uday was doing).

I would now like to offer advice on what to do about OTHER
extremists. The terms of the inquiry specifically mention
"Islamist" and "far right-wing" extremism, although the scope
is not limited to those.

Unfortunately the West has done such a good job of preventing
Nazis from airing their views, and there are so few of them
actually in existence, that I have not had the benefit of
directly talking to a Nazi to understand WHY they would think
that Hitler's ramblings were authoritive/inerrant. If you put
me directly in touch with Albury teen who was arrested, I could
try to get a handle on this phenomenon. I'm happy to do this
psychoanalysis for free - it's what I do instead of volunteering
for a soup kitchen.

My guess is that the Albury man has finally found a book that
actually states that whites have been pretty bloody successful
in world history, instead of being fed the constant anti-white
racism (worldwide) that all whites are born evil and spend all
their time making life miserable for other races. Plenty of
people see right through that nonsense and attempt to find an
alternative source of information than what the Australian
government (etc) is peddling. Note that 9/11 is partially due
to anti-white racism, and the Australian government (and the
American government) is complicit in this. Note that it is
NATURAL for humans to be racist, so an IDEOLOGY
of anti-racism needs to be taught (to all races). Unfortunately,
what is ACTUALLY being taught is anti-white racism (to all
races). This has had the effect of almost completely eliminating
white supremacism in Australia, and even making half of white
Australians anti-white whites. But it's unlikely you'll ever get
100% of white Australians to subscribe to that line of bullshit.
You'll certainly never get ME to subscribe to it, although if you
physically torture me I will SWEAR BLIND that I hate whites too.
There's also the side-effect of the fact that all the other races
are (largely, no group is 100% anything) anti-white too, instead
of doing some serious introspection - so that holds them back too,
as they blame their problems on whites instead of themselves.

Note that white Russians have a similar problem. They don't blame
their failures on whites, but blame it on the evil West. It's a
hell of a lot easier to blame all your problems on someone else
instead of taking a good hard look at yourself. This is apparently
human nature, ie something we need IDEOLOGY to overcome. It is
possible to get literally 100% of humans to believe something that
is FALSE (such as the Sun goes around the Earth) so there is
probably no technical barrier to getting 100% of humans to believe
something that is TRUE (such as the Earth goes around the Sun).

Another thing I would like to point out that Nazism, ie National
SOCIALISM, is actually another loopy left-wing idea, and it does
a disservice to capitalism to call this "extreme right". It's
about time that the right-wing Australian government called a
spade a spade and called it an extreme left-wing ideology, like
communism. Australia has had communist terrorists in the past too.
Calling Nazism "right-wing" is a BIG LIE by the Communists, and
it's about time we fixed the ENGLISH LANGUAGE. You can also take
away "progressive" and "liberal" to describe the left-wing.

It is unfortunate that Communism, despite killing 100 million
people, hasn't been discredited like Nazism has. People are still
openly communist and not being called on it. But worse than that,
Marxist propaganda has poisoned the well with its talk of
colonialism and how everything is about class and money. These
thoughts are STILL with us today. There's virtually no-one at all
explaining that colonialism was the best thing to ever happen to
Africa. No matter how much food aid the West gives to Africa today,
it falls on deaf ears. Everyone will rationalize this away instead
of changing their underlying Marxist-based worldview. Excuses are
typically something like "Australia is just trying to get a trade
deal". Perhaps the Africans should be sending aid to Australia to
get a trade deal with Australia.

Most Australians have been successfully indoctrinated to believe
that Australia was on the wrong side of the Vietnam War. No attempt
has been made to set the record straight that the communist north
was an evil regime and of no benefit to the people of the south or
north, and that Australia was doing a noble deed. No attempt has
been made to discredit John Kerry for his lies about atrocities in
Vietnam. No attempt has been made to discredit fools like Peter
Garrett for trying to get the West to unilaterally give up our
nuclear weapons instead of fighting the USSR till the end of time.

Australians are not being directly indoctrinated to believe that
Marx's writings are inerrant. It's just that it's a really easy
option for the lazy, the greedy, the incompetent. Instead of
accepting that they'll never amount to anything, and the best
thing they can do is just die so that they can stop leeching off
welfare, an attractive alternative is available to them. They can
blame everything on "capitalists" and simply get the government to
redistribute wealth to them. This is probably the NATURAL state of
humans - to blame your problems on someone else instead of taking
a good hard look at yourself. So that explains how this dangerous
ideology can take hold, with devastating consequences in places
like Venezuela where people simply vote them into power.

Next let's address Islamist extremism. Here we have another
inerrant book. The reason most people "decide" this book is
"inerrant" is because they were indoctrinated to believe that
as a child. The vast bulk of humanity will not pick up a book
such as that and say "sounds good, sounds perfect in fact!".
Fortunately most Muslims choose to either not read it, or not
follow it. Well, "fortunately". If all Muslims were actually
following it, including the bits to wage war on infidels, we
would have a firmer grasp on the problem and be able to eliminate
it completely, the same way that Nazism was effectively eliminated.
By failing to eliminate this ideology from the face of the earth,
do not be surprised when groups like ISIS emerge and reinstitute
slavery (as Mohammed did) and rape their slaves, all supposedly
ordained by God (see 33:50 in the Koran). ISIS attracted Muslims
from around the world. There was even a white Australian, with
no Muslim upbringing, who went to Iraq to be a suicide (homicide)
bomber. If the world military equation changes in the future, and
Islam dominates, YOUR descendants could end up being like Pakistani
non-Muslims. All someone needs to do is point to your non-Muslim
great-great-grandchild and say "blasphemy" for a brutal death - if
not by a mob, then by the state. You do everyone a disservice by
pandering to this ideology instead of e.g. invading Pakistan etc.

What would be better is if there were extremists who thought that
Australian law was inerrant, and fervently sought to export THAT
worldwide. Actually, my ideology is very close to Australian law
(or "Australian values" - which aren't really unique to Australia
so you should really find a better name). And I am seeking to
violently (via state violence) export "Australian ideology"
worldwide. I even want "instant-runoff voting" (aka "preferential
voting") exported to USA, as I consider that the Americans
currently have a very poor democracy that excludes third parties
from arising. But fixing America is not my priority. My first
priority is just to break open freedom of speech and have some
semblance of human rights in places like Iraq and Iran. That's why
I was a very fervent supporter of the 2003 Iraq war. Democracy is
also good (and has strategic value) but I value freedom of speech
(which we don't even fully have in Australia) and human rights
(again, which even Australia falls short on) more than relying on
citizens (like the Venezuelans) to democratically protect those
things.

Finally let's take a look at the biggest DOGMA in Australia -
the BIBLE. It is completely ironic that this is the book that
people swear on in court when they promise to tell "the truth,
the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" before they then go
on to tell a pack of lies just as dishonest as the bible. Hey,
they have nothing to lose, apparently Jesus died for their sins
so they can "get their money's worth". Catholics have more
immediate respite where they just need to go to "confession" and
get confirmation that their sins are all washed away. Unmarried,
sexually frustrated Catholic priests hear an endless series of
sex scandals and poor altar boys become the victims. Instead of
addressing root cause, by discreditting this ideology, or ensure
that Catholic priests are given parish money and directed to the
nearest (legal) Australian brothel, we act "surprised" when a
priest rapes a child. It's not surprising at all. It's totally
expected.

Having said that, Christianity is mostly pacified in Australia,
so we see very little Christian extremism. Theoretically there
is nothing stopping a Christian from picking up the bible,
reading Numbers 15:32-36 and deciding to stone people to death
for working on Saturday or Sunday, but it's not actually happening.
Most Australian Christians don't see the bible as inerrant (this
is what REALLY saves us) and those that do see it as inerrant
have a long list of excuses and mental acrobatics worthy of a
Special Olympics. You can put that quote right in their face and
ask them to start stoning "weekend workers" and they will point
blank refuse to do it. So if Christianity is not banned in
Australia, it's no big deal. It will likely die out on its own
eventually. On the other hand, it may still be causing great
harm in the world, as people quote "turn the other cheek" and
"love thy enemy" to justify leaving a tyrant like Saddam in
power where he can rape women and cut out the tongues of men.
So long as it's only happening to foreigners/non-Christians, no
harm done, right?

If the Australian government is serious about eliminating
extremist ideology, it should be ensuring that no child is
indoctrinated with any of these truly horrible ideologies.
"Australian values" should be renamed to perhaps "universal
values", and this should be the only thing children are
indoctrinated with. When they turn 18 they are free to reject
"Australian values" and replace them with "Christian values"
that authorize slavery and torturing your own children to
death (Deuteronomy 21:18-21) as part of "freedom of religion"
and "freedom of speech". But SO TOO should Nazis be given
permission to promote gassing Jews, so that we can identify
the problem and take preventitive action (ie debate), instead
of driving the problem undergound. Only if there are sufficient
numbers of Nazis that it seems possible that they will come to
power democratically should the Nazi Party be TEMPORARILY
banned. The Communists were never banned either, although it
was a close thing.

In the same way that the Australian public needs to be given
a chance to debate Nazis, we also need to be given a chance
to debate Muslims, without falling afoul of the "incitement
to racial hatred" laws. Also neither whites nor Aborigines
should fall afoul of those laws, although I note that the
laws only seem to be applied to whites currently, and the
Australian government is literally getting away with apartheid
(and ironically Pauline Hanson is the one accused of racism
for trying to dismantle that system). NSW Hospitals are
literally asking "Are you Aboriginal or Torres Strait islander?"
as if that is relevant to MEDICAL TREATMENT. It should be
constitutionally forbidden to ask that question. What is the
correct answer for someone who is 1/4 Aboriginal anyway?

Given that Twitter is even banning the US president, I suggest
that the Australian government organize an alternative "free
speech" platform (I trust the Australian government more than
I do a left-wing American company) and Al Qaeda and ISIS should
be explicitly invited to create accounts, and promote non-state
violence against Australians, so that we can ask them why, try
to talk them out of it, and arrange for them to be killed (via
war, when they pick up a gun to oppose the ADF's entry into
their country, or oppose local allies in that country).