From: Paul Edwards, mutazilah@gmail.com To: Committee Secretary, PJCIS, PO Box 6021, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia Date: 2021-01-15 Dear Sir, This is the FOURTH ADDENDUM to my previous submission regarding: "Inquiry into extremist movements and radicalism in Australia". As explained in previous submissions, I have self-radicalized, as a result of DECADES of research into world affairs. It has nothing to do with the Australian education system or the religion I was indoctrinated with as a child, or because of some book I discovered and was so impressed I treated it as "holy" (or, a DOGMA). Nor does it have anything to do with "poverty". However, these things DID provide me with "background knowledge". The rest is derived from first principles using the scientific method, with just the tentative axiom of "women have the right to not be raped" (like Saddam was ordering and Uday was doing). I would now like to offer advice on what to do about OTHER extremists. The terms of the inquiry specifically mention "Islamist" and "far right-wing" extremism, although the scope is not limited to those. Unfortunately the West has done such a good job of preventing Nazis from airing their views, and there are so few of them actually in existence, that I have not had the benefit of directly talking to a Nazi to understand WHY they would think that Hitler's ramblings were authoritive/inerrant. If you put me directly in touch with Albury teen who was arrested, I could try to get a handle on this phenomenon. I'm happy to do this psychoanalysis for free - it's what I do instead of volunteering for a soup kitchen. My guess is that the Albury man has finally found a book that actually states that whites have been pretty bloody successful in world history, instead of being fed the constant anti-white racism (worldwide) that all whites are born evil and spend all their time making life miserable for other races. Plenty of people see right through that nonsense and attempt to find an alternative source of information than what the Australian government (etc) is peddling. Note that 9/11 is partially due to anti-white racism, and the Australian government (and the American government) is complicit in this. Note that it is NATURAL for humans to be racist, so an IDEOLOGY of anti-racism needs to be taught (to all races). Unfortunately, what is ACTUALLY being taught is anti-white racism (to all races). This has had the effect of almost completely eliminating white supremacism in Australia, and even making half of white Australians anti-white whites. But it's unlikely you'll ever get 100% of white Australians to subscribe to that line of bullshit. You'll certainly never get ME to subscribe to it, although if you physically torture me I will SWEAR BLIND that I hate whites too. There's also the side-effect of the fact that all the other races are (largely, no group is 100% anything) anti-white too, instead of doing some serious introspection - so that holds them back too, as they blame their problems on whites instead of themselves. Note that white Russians have a similar problem. They don't blame their failures on whites, but blame it on the evil West. It's a hell of a lot easier to blame all your problems on someone else instead of taking a good hard look at yourself. This is apparently human nature, ie something we need IDEOLOGY to overcome. It is possible to get literally 100% of humans to believe something that is FALSE (such as the Sun goes around the Earth) so there is probably no technical barrier to getting 100% of humans to believe something that is TRUE (such as the Earth goes around the Sun). Another thing I would like to point out that Nazism, ie National SOCIALISM, is actually another loopy left-wing idea, and it does a disservice to capitalism to call this "extreme right". It's about time that the right-wing Australian government called a spade a spade and called it an extreme left-wing ideology, like communism. Australia has had communist terrorists in the past too. Calling Nazism "right-wing" is a BIG LIE by the Communists, and it's about time we fixed the ENGLISH LANGUAGE. You can also take away "progressive" and "liberal" to describe the left-wing. It is unfortunate that Communism, despite killing 100 million people, hasn't been discredited like Nazism has. People are still openly communist and not being called on it. But worse than that, Marxist propaganda has poisoned the well with its talk of colonialism and how everything is about class and money. These thoughts are STILL with us today. There's virtually no-one at all explaining that colonialism was the best thing to ever happen to Africa. No matter how much food aid the West gives to Africa today, it falls on deaf ears. Everyone will rationalize this away instead of changing their underlying Marxist-based worldview. Excuses are typically something like "Australia is just trying to get a trade deal". Perhaps the Africans should be sending aid to Australia to get a trade deal with Australia. Most Australians have been successfully indoctrinated to believe that Australia was on the wrong side of the Vietnam War. No attempt has been made to set the record straight that the communist north was an evil regime and of no benefit to the people of the south or north, and that Australia was doing a noble deed. No attempt has been made to discredit John Kerry for his lies about atrocities in Vietnam. No attempt has been made to discredit fools like Peter Garrett for trying to get the West to unilaterally give up our nuclear weapons instead of fighting the USSR till the end of time. Australians are not being directly indoctrinated to believe that Marx's writings are inerrant. It's just that it's a really easy option for the lazy, the greedy, the incompetent. Instead of accepting that they'll never amount to anything, and the best thing they can do is just die so that they can stop leeching off welfare, an attractive alternative is available to them. They can blame everything on "capitalists" and simply get the government to redistribute wealth to them. This is probably the NATURAL state of humans - to blame your problems on someone else instead of taking a good hard look at yourself. So that explains how this dangerous ideology can take hold, with devastating consequences in places like Venezuela where people simply vote them into power. Next let's address Islamist extremism. Here we have another inerrant book. The reason most people "decide" this book is "inerrant" is because they were indoctrinated to believe that as a child. The vast bulk of humanity will not pick up a book such as that and say "sounds good, sounds perfect in fact!". Fortunately most Muslims choose to either not read it, or not follow it. Well, "fortunately". If all Muslims were actually following it, including the bits to wage war on infidels, we would have a firmer grasp on the problem and be able to eliminate it completely, the same way that Nazism was effectively eliminated. By failing to eliminate this ideology from the face of the earth, do not be surprised when groups like ISIS emerge and reinstitute slavery (as Mohammed did) and rape their slaves, all supposedly ordained by God (see 33:50 in the Koran). ISIS attracted Muslims from around the world. There was even a white Australian, with no Muslim upbringing, who went to Iraq to be a suicide (homicide) bomber. If the world military equation changes in the future, and Islam dominates, YOUR descendants could end up being like Pakistani non-Muslims. All someone needs to do is point to your non-Muslim great-great-grandchild and say "blasphemy" for a brutal death - if not by a mob, then by the state. You do everyone a disservice by pandering to this ideology instead of e.g. invading Pakistan etc. What would be better is if there were extremists who thought that Australian law was inerrant, and fervently sought to export THAT worldwide. Actually, my ideology is very close to Australian law (or "Australian values" - which aren't really unique to Australia so you should really find a better name). And I am seeking to violently (via state violence) export "Australian ideology" worldwide. I even want "instant-runoff voting" (aka "preferential voting") exported to USA, as I consider that the Americans currently have a very poor democracy that excludes third parties from arising. But fixing America is not my priority. My first priority is just to break open freedom of speech and have some semblance of human rights in places like Iraq and Iran. That's why I was a very fervent supporter of the 2003 Iraq war. Democracy is also good (and has strategic value) but I value freedom of speech (which we don't even fully have in Australia) and human rights (again, which even Australia falls short on) more than relying on citizens (like the Venezuelans) to democratically protect those things. Finally let's take a look at the biggest DOGMA in Australia - the BIBLE. It is completely ironic that this is the book that people swear on in court when they promise to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" before they then go on to tell a pack of lies just as dishonest as the bible. Hey, they have nothing to lose, apparently Jesus died for their sins so they can "get their money's worth". Catholics have more immediate respite where they just need to go to "confession" and get confirmation that their sins are all washed away. Unmarried, sexually frustrated Catholic priests hear an endless series of sex scandals and poor altar boys become the victims. Instead of addressing root cause, by discreditting this ideology, or ensure that Catholic priests are given parish money and directed to the nearest (legal) Australian brothel, we act "surprised" when a priest rapes a child. It's not surprising at all. It's totally expected. Having said that, Christianity is mostly pacified in Australia, so we see very little Christian extremism. Theoretically there is nothing stopping a Christian from picking up the bible, reading Numbers 15:32-36 and deciding to stone people to death for working on Saturday or Sunday, but it's not actually happening. Most Australian Christians don't see the bible as inerrant (this is what REALLY saves us) and those that do see it as inerrant have a long list of excuses and mental acrobatics worthy of a Special Olympics. You can put that quote right in their face and ask them to start stoning "weekend workers" and they will point blank refuse to do it. So if Christianity is not banned in Australia, it's no big deal. It will likely die out on its own eventually. On the other hand, it may still be causing great harm in the world, as people quote "turn the other cheek" and "love thy enemy" to justify leaving a tyrant like Saddam in power where he can rape women and cut out the tongues of men. So long as it's only happening to foreigners/non-Christians, no harm done, right? If the Australian government is serious about eliminating extremist ideology, it should be ensuring that no child is indoctrinated with any of these truly horrible ideologies. "Australian values" should be renamed to perhaps "universal values", and this should be the only thing children are indoctrinated with. When they turn 18 they are free to reject "Australian values" and replace them with "Christian values" that authorize slavery and torturing your own children to death (Deuteronomy 21:18-21) as part of "freedom of religion" and "freedom of speech". But SO TOO should Nazis be given permission to promote gassing Jews, so that we can identify the problem and take preventitive action (ie debate), instead of driving the problem undergound. Only if there are sufficient numbers of Nazis that it seems possible that they will come to power democratically should the Nazi Party be TEMPORARILY banned. The Communists were never banned either, although it was a close thing. In the same way that the Australian public needs to be given a chance to debate Nazis, we also need to be given a chance to debate Muslims, without falling afoul of the "incitement to racial hatred" laws. Also neither whites nor Aborigines should fall afoul of those laws, although I note that the laws only seem to be applied to whites currently, and the Australian government is literally getting away with apartheid (and ironically Pauline Hanson is the one accused of racism for trying to dismantle that system). NSW Hospitals are literally asking "Are you Aboriginal or Torres Strait islander?" as if that is relevant to MEDICAL TREATMENT. It should be constitutionally forbidden to ask that question. What is the correct answer for someone who is 1/4 Aboriginal anyway? Given that Twitter is even banning the US president, I suggest that the Australian government organize an alternative "free speech" platform (I trust the Australian government more than I do a left-wing American company) and Al Qaeda and ISIS should be explicitly invited to create accounts, and promote non-state violence against Australians, so that we can ask them why, try to talk them out of it, and arrange for them to be killed (via war, when they pick up a gun to oppose the ADF's entry into their country, or oppose local allies in that country).